1Cadre de l'atelier
| Objective | Identify Risk Sources (RS) and their Targeted Objectives (TO) in relation to the subject of the study. |
|---|---|
| Inputs | Business values and feared events (Workshop 1). |
| Participants | Business teams, CISO, cyber-threat intelligence specialist, and management for approval. |
| Sorties | RS/TO pairs selected for the rest of the study; secondary pairs placed under monitoring; pair map. |
Risk Source (RS)
An element that, alone or combined with others, can generate a risk—typically an attacker or category of attackers.
Targeted Objective (TO)
The effect sought by a risk source in line with its motivations.
2Risk-source families
If no dedicated intelligence service exists, whether internal or outsourced CTI, work directly from broad families:
At this stage, there is no need to consider risk sources targeting your providers rather than you directly; Workshop 3 addresses this through the ecosystem.
3Build RS/TO pairs
After identifying RSs and TOs separately, build meaningful pairs by linking objectives to sources. Relationships are many-to-many: one risk source may target several objectives, and one objective may be targeted by several sources.
4Running example
Returning to the example of a pupil hacking the school system to improve their grades:
| Risk source | Pupil |
|---|---|
| Targeted objective | Change school results (or, in a variant, take revenge on the school) |
| Motivation | Strong motivation to secure promotion to the next grade |
| Ressources | Access to a basic computer |
5Assess the relevance of an RS/TO pair
Each selected pair is assessed according to the risk source's motivation de la source, ses resources (technical, financial, and human capabilities) and, when known, its activity previously observed against the organisation or its sector. Together these define relevance, sometimes called IPR. Only the most relevant pairs continue; others can be monitored rather than permanently discarded.